On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> Morgan Brassel wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I think I discovered a bug in the 'num' alternative of the bib module. It >> seems to be incompatible with the prefix=+ option of referencing. > > Yes, indeed. It is doubtful that it ever will be compatible with > prefixes, it needs to do too much black magic behind the scenes. Hi Taco, Thank you for the information. That's not really a problem to me, I'll change my references to new ones. >> By the way, the 'num' alternative also gives an unknow reference when >> \completepublications is not present, while the default alternative is OK. Is >> there a particular reason for this? Thanks. > > Yes. You are asking for the sequence number in the list of publications. > That is (by definition) undefined if there is no such list (yet). I see. Anyway, it seems weird to make citations in a document without including a bibliography... Greetings, Morgan ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
