Am 2008-04-30 um 19:22 schrieb luigi scarso: > Ah yes, at my printing company > 1) pfb/pfa : "good" fonts (& not "easy" to install in luatex ) > 2) otf : "good" fonts (& "easy" to install ) > 3) ttf : "bad" fonts (& "easy " to install ) > > Of course it's not exactly true (but maybe on average): > a mental habitat, I must admit it, based on experience. > Also, an helvetica like typeface is a must.
In the old times some PS Level2 RIPs couldn't handle Truetype fonts. And most bad fonts are Truetype. But in fact the format tells nothing about quality or printability. OpenType fonts can contain Truetype-based outlines as well as PostScript-based (quadratic vs. cubic curves). Usually .otf files contain PostScript-based outlines, while .ttf can mean "old" Truetype as well as TrueType-based OpenType. I.e. the TrueType format can encode its slots in Unicode (obligatory for OpenType) or in any other encoding. >> I have just uploaded a new version to the garden. > good. Greek is really difficult for me Yes, it's Greek to everyone ;-) Greetlings from Lake Constance! Hraban --- http://www.fiee.net/texnique/ http://wiki.contextgarden.net https://www.cacert.org (I'm an assurer) ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
