Martin Schröder schrieb:
mh, just made a 'minimal' example and it looks like this bug is not related to png transparency. this wasn't visible in my real world example (only transparent areas of the png were affected).2008/7/16 Peter Rolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:the results (don't continue to read if you want a happy end):pdftex 1.40.3 produces a pdf, that shows no side effects when it's included by the same version of pdftex (1.40.3). if i include that pdf with the current 1.40.9-rc1 i get the wrong color in the transparent area. mh, who to blame? the producer or the collector?Both. :-{ Please open a bug for pdftex at sarovar and be sure to include all relevant files, please.
looks more like a mess of layer priorities to me (just guessing).context example attached (inclusion.tex is the main file, testpdf.tex is the source for the included pdf).
so before i file a bug report, can someone confirm this? i used pdftex 1.40.9-rc1 for this test.
cheers, peter
Best Martin ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
test.tar.bz2
Description: Binary data
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________