On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Peter Rolf wrote:
> Martin Schröder schrieb:
>>
>> 2008/7/16 Peter Rolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>
>>> the results (don't continue to read if you want a happy end):
>>>
>>> pdftex 1.40.3 produces a pdf, that shows no side effects when it's
>>> included by the same version of pdftex (1.40.3).
>>> if i include that pdf with the current 1.40.9-rc1 i get the wrong color
>>> in the transparent area.
>>> mh, who to blame? the producer or the collector?
>>
>> Both. :-{
>>
>> Please open a bug for pdftex at sarovar and be sure to include all
>> relevant files, please.
>>
> mh, just made a 'minimal' example and it looks like this bug is not related
> to png transparency. this wasn't visible in my real world example (only
> transparent areas of the png were affected).
> looks more like a mess of layer priorities to me (just guessing).
>
> context example attached (inclusion.tex is the main file, testpdf.tex is the
> source for the included pdf).
>
> so before i file a bug report, can someone confirm this? i used pdftex
> 1.40.9-rc1 for this test.I don't see any difference with the latest pdftex and with the one provided in TeX Live 2007. But I do see a difference when adding \setupcolors[state=start] to testpdf.tex. In that case it works, though I have no idea what "no color enabled" means to ConTeXt - it usually uses black for just about anything except white. I would not wonder if ConTeXt "forgot" to fill the background with white, but it's hard to tell. Mojca ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
