Dnia Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:38:59AM +0100, luigi scarso napisał(a): > On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:28 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ConTeXt peaple always have used to say that ConTeXt is better than LaTeX. > > yes, true.
Not entirely (see below). > Also > LaTeX peaple always have used to say that LaTeX is better than ConTeXt > is true > > > > > > I have been recieving emails from CoNTeXt list and it seems that ConTeXt > > has heaps of bugs. > > > > There are some bugs. As in most software projects. And, that;s true, there _are_ lots of bugs in ConTeXt. But still, it is very usable. > > > > > > LaTeX rocks...! > > true, if you are from LaTeX peaple. Well, I've been using LaTeX for several years and I don't think it to be really rocking. And neither is ConTeXt (yet) - see below. And the question is: why to start yet another flame war? I am the proof (by example) that the sets of plain TeX people, LaTeX people and ConTeXt people have a nonempty intersection. There are areas where LaTeX is much better than ConTeXt: when I write a paper on maths, almost no journal will accept ConTeXt. Also, LaTeX is very stable and ConTeXt is not. OTOH, when ConTeXt reaches the maturity level of LaTeX, it _will_ be much better - but we'll have to wait a while for it to happen. Greets -- Marcin Borkowski (http://mbork.pl) Emacs: Escape-Meta-Alt-Control-Shift. ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
