On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Wolfgang Schuster < schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > Am 13.05.2009 um 17:51 schrieb luigi scarso: > > I have not look at simplefonts as I want -- I planned >> to use it for an article on felltypes for arstexnica >> > > You fixed the problem with the felltype fonts? > > On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Wolfgang Schuster < schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > Am 13.05.2009 um 17:51 schrieb luigi scarso: > > I have not look at simplefonts as I want -- I planned >> to use it for an article on felltypes for arstexnica >> > > You fixed the problem with the felltype fonts? No, maybe this weekend I will able to investigate a bit more . The problem is the follow: pdf make with felltypes and mkiv looks ugly in AdobeReader9 ---but not in xpdf with latest freetype -- because of a unsual em size. If you install the fonts in OpenOffice, the same document looks ok. $>pdffonts felltype.pdf name type emb sub uni object ID ------------------------------------ ----------------- --- --- --- --------- PDPWHW+LMRoman12-Regular CID Type 0C yes yes yes 4 0 DUTOMC+IM_FELL_Double_Pica_PRO_Roman CID Type 0C yes yes yes 5 0 $>pdffonts felltype_oo.pdf name type emb sub uni object ID ------------------------------------ ----------------- --- --- --- --------- FTLUYL+IM_FELL_Double_Pica_PRO_Roman Type 1C yes yes no 8 0 FTLUYL+IM_FELL_Double_Pica_PRO_Roman Type 1C So I don't understand how OO "transform" this opentype in a Type1 , and if is it possible to do the same thing in mkiv. -- luigi
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
