On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Taco Hoekwater <t...@elvenkind.com> wrote:
> > > luigi scarso wrote: > > > > $>pdffonts felltype.pdf > > name type emb sub uni object > ID > > ------------------------------------ ----------------- --- --- --- > --------- > > PDPWHW+LMRoman12-Regular CID Type 0C yes yes yes 4 > 0 > > DUTOMC+IM_FELL_Double_Pica_PRO_Roman CID Type 0C yes yes yes 5 > 0 > > > > $>pdffonts felltype_oo.pdf > > name type emb sub uni object > ID > > ------------------------------------ ----------------- --- --- --- > --------- > > FTLUYL+IM_FELL_Double_Pica_PRO_Roman Type 1C yes yes no 8 > 0 > > FTLUYL+IM_FELL_Double_Pica_PRO_Roman Type 1C > > > > So I don't understand how OO "transform" this opentype in a Type1 , > > I guess that that is not hard when a document uses no more than 256 > glyphs from the font. yes, a sort of creation of font encodings at fly for more than 256 glyphs -- but why ? Also, does it fix em size, given that this appears to be the root of the problem ? > Can you experiment a bit and see what happens > if you use more of them? > > yes ,if I have time this weekend -- volunteer welcome, of course. -- luigi
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
