On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 7:07 PM, Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus.li...@gmail.com>wrote:
> John Haltiwanger <john.haltiwanger <at> gmail.com> writes: > > [...] > > > Markdown with RDFa on the side will suit quite nicely, thanks to pandoc. > > Actually, you can embed the RDFa within the markdown files if you like. > > <div property="x:section"> > > # Introduction > > Test. > </div> > > Pandoc will just pass it on to the output XHTML (though throw it out for > the > context). But it's admittedly a little awkward to have to wrap the markdown > with > XHTML every time to want to add a triple. > Probably the biggest barrier for semanticality so far has been what a struggle it is to incorporate into a fluid workflow. For instance yes that is a pain to mix the markup and RDFa, but even more so if you are coding straight XHTML (though visually it would look a bit less awkward, XHTML is already so verbose that adding in the semanticality feels annoyingly burdensome.) If only markdown had some syntax for it, like |x:test # Introduction |x:section Test. || Wishful thinking. Cheers, John C. Haltiwanger
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
