Am Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:21:48 -0400 schrieb Aditya Mahajan: > On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Martin Scholz wrote: > >> Am Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:05:07 -0400 schrieb Aditya Mahajan: >> >>> On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Martin Scholz wrote: >>> >>>> Hi List, >>>> >>>> does anybody of you know if there is context package/module that >>>> provides the usability of AMS symbols like \subsetneq or \subsetneqq? >>> >>> MkII or MkIV? >> MkII >>> >>>> or is the only way to define every symbol by hand manually in the >>>> form of >>>> >>>> \mathchardef\subsetneq=#### >>> >>> Just send a list of symbols that are missing, and we will add them to >>> the core. >>> >>> Aditya >>> >> Just answered Hans with the part that missed in my opinion. but if it >> is there, I don't know what I'm doing wrong... > > I don't know. The following works fine here with the current minimals. > > \starttext > $\subsetneqq\subsetneq\supsetneqq\supsetneq$ \stoptext > > It also works correctly on contextgarden (live.contextgarden.net). To be > explicit, you can try to force the ams definitions: > > \definetypeface[mainface][rm][serif][modern][default][encoding= \defaultencoding] > \definetypeface[mainface][ss][sans] > [modern][default][encoding=\defaultencoding] > \definetypeface[mainface][tt][mono] > [modern][default][encoding=\defaultencoding] > \definetypeface[mainface][mm][mant] [modern][ams] > [encoding=\defaultencoding] > > \setupbodyfont[mainface] > Ok I found out where the problem is and why I need to define the folowing symbols manually like this: \font\msbmx=msbm10 at 10pt \textfont15=\msbmx \mathchardef\subsetneqq="3F24 \mathchardef\subsetneq="3F28 \mathchardef\supsetneqq="3F25 \mathchardef\supsetneq="3F29
I'm using the following setup: \definetypeface[modern][mm][math][modern][ams][endocing=\defaultencoding] because in this connection the following part produces the nicer output, or it there a way to the the dstroke environment behave like in the math under mant? \definefamilysynonym[default][doublestroke][mb] \def\dstroke {\fam\purefamily {doublestroke}} here the Symbol for natural Numbers is produced like ||\| and not like |\\| hope the ascii-Art is readable... Greetings Martin ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________