Am Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:46:23 -0400 schrieb Aditya Mahajan: > On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Martin Scholz wrote: > >> Am Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:21:48 -0400 schrieb Aditya Mahajan: >> >>> On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Martin Scholz wrote: >>> >>>> Am Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:05:07 -0400 schrieb Aditya Mahajan: >>>> >>>>> On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Martin Scholz wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi List, >>>>>> >>>>>> does anybody of you know if there is context package/module that >>>>>> provides the usability of AMS symbols like \subsetneq or >>>>>> \subsetneqq? >>>>> >>>>> MkII or MkIV? >>>> MkII >>>>> >>>>>> or is the only way to define every symbol by hand manually in the >>>>>> form of >>>>>> >>>>>> \mathchardef\subsetneq=#### >>>>> >>>>> Just send a list of symbols that are missing, and we will add them >>>>> to the core. >>>>> >>>>> Aditya >>>>> >>>> Just answered Hans with the part that missed in my opinion. but if it >>>> is there, I don't know what I'm doing wrong... >>> >>> I don't know. The following works fine here with the current minimals. >>> >>> \starttext >>> $\subsetneqq\subsetneq\supsetneqq\supsetneq$ \stoptext >>> >>> It also works correctly on contextgarden (live.contextgarden.net). To >>> be explicit, you can try to force the ams definitions: >>> >>> \definetypeface[mainface][rm][serif][modern][default][encoding= >> \defaultencoding] >>> \definetypeface[mainface][ss][sans] >>> [modern][default][encoding=\defaultencoding] >>> \definetypeface[mainface][tt][mono] >>> [modern][default][encoding=\defaultencoding] >>> \definetypeface[mainface][mm][mant] [modern][ams] >>> [encoding=\defaultencoding] >>> >>> \setupbodyfont[mainface] >>> >> Ok I found out where the problem is and why I need to define the >> folowing symbols manually like this: >> \font\msbmx=msbm10 at 10pt >> \textfont15=\msbmx >> \mathchardef\subsetneqq="3F24 >> \mathchardef\subsetneq="3F28 >> \mathchardef\supsetneqq="3F25 >> \mathchardef\supsetneq="3F29 >> >> I'm using the following setup: >> >> \definetypeface[modern][mm][math][modern][ams][endocing= \defaultencoding] >> >> because in this connection the following part produces the nicer >> output, or it there a way to the the dstroke environment behave like in >> the math under mant? > > http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Doublestroke > > Aditya
Thanks after that link I'm using dstroke. you used in brackets [mant] instead of [math] in the following command \definetypeface[modern][mm][math][modern][ams][endocing= \defaultencoding] so with math it is correct with mant it is the wrong one. Is there a way to combine math and mant together? so that one can use the defined symbols in mant and use the nicer doublestroke symbols in math? Greetings and really many thanks Martin ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
