2009/11/1 Mojca Miklavec <mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com>: > Or maybe I was too fast. I don't find the exact timeline of libc > development, so I have no idea how old your linux is. I thought that > this failure was recent, but apparently it's not (the garden most > probably has libc-2.8). For 32-bit linux we try to be *very* backward > compatible. For 64-bit Peter most probably has the oldest linux OS > running on 64-bit processor in the community. > > You are the first one with something older. The problem is that either: > - we need to find someone that will compile the binaries on old-enough linux > - or, if you have a chance to figure out how to upgrade to something > that supports at least 2.7
2.7 is quite new, and 2.8 is very new. My SUSE 10.3 (which is now two years old and will be upgraded soon) has 2.6.1. Best Martin ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
