luigi scarso wrote:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Taco Hoekwater <t...@elvenkind.com> wrote:
I believe it is safe to say that that rendering is quite wrong. ;)
The problem is that pratically this pdf is wrong because
Acroread is not able to print.
AR also shows something different from xpdf , gs shows the same of AR too
mupdf show something completely different,
and I believe from experience that xpdf is right,
but at this point the only thing that I care is to understand what is
wrong with AR given that xpdf is right.
The only solution is to uncompress and study the pdf
and the source -- which we don't have .
mupdf tools, xpdf tools, and gs can help in this:
it seems that xref is a bit messy, so it can be a problem of metapost
too, or maybe not at all.
as it concerns an older luatex ... it's probably the zero xscale ...
0 0 0 1 0 0 cm
makes acrobat unhappy
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
