On 7-3-2010 18:29, Philipp Gesang wrote:
So in this case, you would have \xmlinclude{test}{afile}{file}.
Yes, that did it. I thoroughly confused the notion of “lpath” in
xml-mkiv.pdf.
it's not xpath but shares quite some properties with it
To actually make use of inc.xml in the current document, perhaps
\xmlprocessfile is what you are after?
[...] snip
That's actually what troubled me in the first mail of this thread. I
don't think \xmlprocessfile is intended to include files this way.
xml in mkiv is still somewhat experimental although the commands and
interfaces will stay; the current implementation is the second one and
has the advanage that it stays closer to xpath and also is more
roundtrip safe (tables of contents and so); i expect further improvements
i use the xml code in production environments so it's performing quite
ok now
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
