Am 30.09.2010 um 20:42 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster: > > Am 30.09.2010 um 20:31 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum: > >>> \definestructureconversionset[footnote][number,characters][numbers] >>> \setupenumerations[footnote][numberconversionset=footnote] >> >> Again, not yet! >> >> Please run the test file: now we have "2.a" ... instead of "2a". > > \definestructureseparatorset [footnote][][] > \definestructureconversionset[footnote][number,characters][numbers] > \setupenumerations[footnote][numberconversionset=footnote,numberseparatorset=footnote]
Wow, it's really needs a lot to change the outfit of one tiny subfoonote ;o) > @Hans Can you make synonyms of the \define... commands without the > “structure” in the name! +1 I assumed that "\definestructurefoo" is always related to structure, meaning structure of document, sections ... not the formatting of footnotes. Next time I know better: it's all about enumeration, it's all about structure today. Thank you very much! Steffen ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
