On 30-9-2010 8:42, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 30.09.2010 um 20:31 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum:
\definestructureconversionset[footnote][number,characters][numbers]
\setupenumerations[footnote][numberconversionset=footnote]
Again, not yet!
Please run the test file: now we have "2.a" ... instead of "2a".
\definestructureseparatorset [footnote][][]
\definestructureconversionset[footnote][number,characters][numbers]
\setupenumerations[footnote][numberconversionset=footnote,numberseparatorset=footnote]
@Hans Can you make synonyms of the \define... commands without the “structure”
in the name!
yes ... later ... eventually 'structure' will go and be the synonyms
(compatinility)
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
