On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 07:09:45PM -0400, Aditya Mahajan wrote: > On Fri, 29 Oct 2010, Khaled Hosny wrote: > > >On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 06:12:10PM -0400, Aditya Mahajan wrote: > >>Hi, > >> > >>\setminus does not scale properly in xits. I am not sure if it is a > >>bug in the font or in ConTeXt. > >> > >>\setupbodyfont[xits] > >>\starttext > >>$A \setminus B$ > >>\stoptext > > > >I don't have larger variants of that glyph, so it is not set to scale. > >If you can find larger glyphs in STIX, I'll use that, but right now all > >those slash/backslash-like glyphs confuse me (and STIX seems to have > >wired shapes compared to similar glyphs in other fonts). > > It should not scale, but the default size is too small. Compare the > size of \setminus in xtis from that in cambria or even LM.
Yes, that what I meant by wired shapes (the slants are sometimes different from similar slashes in other fonts). > Just > going by the glyph table at stix site, set minus should correspond > to glyph 3991 in STIXGeneral.otf. I do not know how to view that > glyph, so do not know if xtis uses the right glyph or not. If you search for 02216 glyph, you will see there is a variant glyph in STIXVar.otf, if you think that variant should be the default I can do that and make the current one available as an optional glyph variant (I think I should check the rest of the STIXVar.otf font too, it was on my todo for a while now). Regards, Khaled -- Khaled Hosny Arabic localiser and member of Arabeyes.org team Free font developer ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
