Hi Aditya, hi all,
On Mo, 10 Jan 2011, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> Assuming that Norbert packaged ConTeXt package in debian testing, I am
> CCing this message to him.
So it seems that current Context has changed something, anyone can help
me here?
Up to now I did:
export TEXMFCNF=/usr/share/texmf/web2c
luatools --generate --verbose
after which everything was working.
Now I get:
[~] luatools --generate --verbose
MTXrun | resolvers: variable 'SELFAUTOLOC' set to '/usr/bin'
MTXrun | resolvers: variable 'SELFAUTODIR' set to '/usr'
MTXrun | resolvers: variable 'SELFAUTOPARENT' set to '.'
MTXrun | resolvers: variable 'TEXMFCNF' set to '/usr/share/texmf/web2c'
MTXrun | resolvers: variable 'TEXMF' set to ''
MTXrun | resolvers: variable 'TEXOS' set to '/usr'
MTXrun | resolvers
MTXrun | resolvers: warning: no lua configuration files found
MTXrun | resolvers
MTXrun | forcing cache reload
MTXrun | resolvers: warning: no lua configuration files found
MTXrun | resolvers
MTXrun | resolvers
MTXrun | the resolver databases are not present or outdated
MTXrun | resolvers: using suffix based filetype 'lua'
MTXrun | resolvers: using suffix based filetype 'lua'
MTXrun | resolvers: remembering file 'mtx-base.lua'
MTXrun | resolvers: using suffix based filetype 'lua'
MTXrun | unknown script 'base.lua' or 'mtx-base.lua'
BTW, why does this mtxrun not *SAY* what file it is searching for???
Just
warning: no lua configuration files found
is as useful as ... welll ... I stop here.
In /usr/share/texmf/web2c/ there is a contextcnf.lua which looks like:
return {
type = "configuration",
version = "1.0.2",
date = "2010-06-07",
time = "14:49:00",
comment = "ConTeXt MkIV configuration file",
....
Is there something missing?
Best wishes
Norbert
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Norbert Preining prein...@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now it is such a bizarrely improbable coincidence that
anything so mindboggingly useful could have evolved purely
by chance that some thinkers have chosen to see it as the
final and clinching proof of the non-existence of God.
The argument goes something like this: `I refuse to prove
that I exist,' says God, `for proof denies faith, and
without faith I am nothing.'
The Babel fish is a dead giveaway, isn't
it? It could not have evolved by chance. It proves you
exist, and so therefore, by your own arguments, you don't.
QED.'
--- Douglas Adams, The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
