On 12-12-2011 23:13, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Either way the moral of the story is still the same: context parsing is very very very confusing and you don't want to go there. In particular you never know if something should be parsed and executed before or after gnuplot processing.
Actually this kind of parsing is rather predictable: you use a buffer, so no parsing takes place. On the other hand, the mp environments are passed directly and therefore the content is expanded, unless a macro is defined as unexpandable (which many macros are).
Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl ----------------------------------------------------------------- ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________