On 1-3-2012 09:30, Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r. o. wrote:
Hello,
as no new answer so far, I started to experiment.
It seems that [at least] component id(s) cannot be omitted:
the tags are (an always will be) mandate
I tested the case when all product/component ids were the same, i.e.
"_", as a dummy value.
As later the ids are referred nowhere, it seems that they are necessary
just due to syntactical rules.
they are also used in
- cross document referencing (component processing)
- logging and reporting
- keeping track of loading environments once
- internal pusp/pop states and hashes
- whatever we need in the future
(so, naming all environments _ will load only one)
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________