On 19 mars 2013, at 19:47, Aditya Mahajan <adit...@umich.edu> wrote:
> […]Although most active users use ConTeXt standalone and are willing to
> update frequently, TL still plays an important role in introducing new users
> to ConTeXt. An experienced TeX user who wants to try ConTeXt is more likely
> to try ConTeXt distributed as part of TL rather than ConTeXt standalone. When
> there are serious bugs with ConTeXt TL, it gives the impression that ConTeXt
> is not a mature macro package.
Hi,
To support what suggests Aditya, I would like to say that the main issue with
the current state of ConTeXt in TeXLive (either mkii or mkiv) is that most «
lambda » users of TeX whom I know in the mathematics world and in accademia,
that is:
--- users who are not familiar with what should be changed in TeXLive,
--- users who don't even know TeX and LaTeX are not synonyms,
--- users who don't know that there exist another environments and
macro packages for typesetting tex-files,
--- users who don't know that using ConTeXt one can do better
typesetting, and that it has better features,
all those users are not going to install a stand alone ConTeXt. They would use
TeXLive, they would try everything in it, but all they want is to write a paper
and typeset it with a TeX package with a single command (or in the case of Mac
users, from within TeXShop or another editor). Most of them do not even know
where TeXLive sits on their computer, and they don't know how to install
something new.
Unfortunately, the ConTeXt in TeXLive does not work out of the box: the user
has to issue a few commands before he can typeset a file with ConTeXt, either
mkii or mkiv (for instance on my installation of TeXLive, after having issued a
few commands, which I don't remember right now, I can use ConTeXt with LuaTeX,
that is mkiv, but I cannot use mkii).
For my part I have been advocating ConTeXt among my colleagues (especially for
course materials and books, since submitting a paper to a journal is
essentially impossible if it is a ConTeXt file). Most of them agree that
ConTeXt gives a much better result, but when it comes to how to use ConTeXt
from TeXLive they are afraid and don't go further. For some of them I have
installed a stand alone ConTeXt, but most of them do not update their
installation, since they would not use the most recent features or improvements
(for most of day to day typesettings, when one does not use complexe features,
even a beta version is sufficiently stable for such users).
So my pledge is this: make any stable version of ConTeXt in TeXLive so that it
works and typesets a tex-file « out of the box », without needing to issue any
command other than:
context myfile.tex
This is the case with LaTeX inside TeXLive, and so I cannot see any strong
reason for ConTeXt not having the same behavior.
Best regards: OKs
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
