On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 6:54 PM, Keith J. Schultz wrote: > Am 20.03.2013 um 09:25 schrieb Marcin Borkowski: >> >> That is quite true, though not that easy. In essence, I think someone >> would have to be paid for tracking the mailing list and updating >> manuals. AFAIK, Sietse does a great job updating the wiki, but the >> wiki is not necessarily the easiest thing to go to for newbies (as you >> have noticed). >> >> It is quite obvious for me that Pragma won't fund such an enterprise >> (not that I'm claiming it should - of course not!). I think the only >> body which might do it is either TUG, either some other UG - but then, I >> guess they are already funding LaTeX3 (which is kind of a competitor - >> albeit friendly - to ConTeXt), either font projects (TeX Gyre!), which >> are quite beneficial to the ConTeXt ecosystem, too. > > I do not get you here. > Garden just needs a little redesigning or more correctly cleaning up. > I see no need for funding.
Marcin wasn't talking about organizing the wiki page, but about writing up-to-date and complete manuals (in PDF) which is nearly impossible with the speed that Hans keeps developing ConTeXt ;). Mojca ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
