On 01/07/2014 07:24 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: >> On 01/06/2014 10:38 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: >>> On 1/6/2014 9:29 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: >>>> [...] >>>> Which one is preferable: luatex or luajittex? >>> >>> both should work although at some point we will move on to > 0.77 >>> specific functionality >>> >>> there will be a luajittex 0.78.1 soon (there is already a binary for >>> windows, as Akira always provides the latest greatest) >>> >>> (and as usual the jit version is some 20% faster due to the faster Lua vm) >> >> Many thanks for your reply, Hans. >> >> I have just updated the ConTeXt Suite (for Linux) and luajittex seems to >> be broken. > > Which one? 32-bit or 64-bit linux (linux or linux-64)?
Many thanks for the reply, Mojca. Linux 32-bits is my architecture. > I failed to automatically compile 32-bit binaries (and I would have to > remember how to switch the compiler and simply didn't care enough at > the time to take the effort + we have problems with weirdly > misbehaving subversion without proper understanding what could go > wrong, so some binary builders weren't even able to submit their > binaries). If that fails it might be due to version mismatch which > means that I need to build the binary first. I guess the version mismatch might cause the issue. Many thanks for your reply, Pablo -- http://www.ousia.tk ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
