On 10/16/2014 11:32 AM, Keith J. Schultz wrote:
Hi Alan,
In a way I agree one can live without the added syntax and semantic
error reporting, But, as you say you have been using it for ten years.
All are not that lucky. Then there are those beginners that simply have
no idea what is going on. Because they do not know ConTeXt, TeX, or LaTeX, etc.
This problem is more severe due to the fact that IMHO the documentation for
ConTeXt does not state many things!
Error checking should not be given up for performance sake!
That is not good practice. If one can not wait a minute longer
for a 500 page document, somebody has to learn to chill down.
well, i can't wait a minute longer
anyway, as there are many ways to invalidate structure the amount of
checking would not only become enourmous but also make the code pretty
much unreadable
also, having chapters outside parts can happen ... you really don't know
how often i have to write styles that violate all principles of
structuring (including consistent font usage)
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
