On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 10:44:43 +0100
Hans Hagen <pra...@wxs.nl> wrote:
> also, but don't tell alan, there is this:
>
> \m[i:tight]{....}
>
> i:default, i:tight, i:half, i:fixed
I spy...
I would suggest that one would set (inline) math spacing and other
options (like \mathscriptsmode) globally for a document, as it would not
be very good style to mix and match.
However, I can see situations where one might want to tighten spacing
in order to fit a particular expression within a line or in a table,
for example. Here, \math[options]{expression} is a reasonable syntax,
yet I cannot foresee ever using the very cryptic \m{} for any reason:
it is just plain ugly! (No TeXie would ever find $<expression>$ as
ugly...)
Alan
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
