On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 14:15:08 +0100, Hans Hagen <pra...@wxs.nl> wrote:
thanks for the quick reply and sorry for my not being precise.
correction/addition follows:
On 1/24/2017 11:33 AM, j. van den hoff wrote:
hi everybody,
after a 2 year hiatus I'm just giving `context' a second try (so, really
not much experience so far).
I updated to the latest version (0.63) before proceeding.
0.63 what? luatex? then you need to check things as we're beyond 1.00 now
I was refering to the `context --version' output:
resolvers | trees | analyzing 'home:texmf'
mtx-context | ConTeXt Process Management 0.63
mtx-context |
mtx-context | main context file:
path_to/context/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/mkiv/context.mkiv
mtx-context | current version: 2017.01.17 17:37
I _was_ under the impression that this is current since I did an update
and `current version' gives a date from last week. or that's what I
believed would happen, when re-running `first-setup.sh': am I mistaken? if
this is a stupid question I'd accept a RTFM answer ;-).
two observations:
1.
in a new document including assorted equations everything went fine
until I tried something like
\startformula
x = \left 1 + 2 \right
\stopformula
\left( ... \right)
left and right take an argument that has to be some known open or close
operator
yes, I know. sorry for the glitch. I _meant_
\startformula
x = \left ( 1 + 2 \right )
\stopformula
and _that_ is what's still causes the `Undefined control sequence' (both,
in the new as well as the two year old unmodified document) -- actually it
is thus reported in
the error message (in the previous mail, too):
"l.472 x = \left (
1 + 2 \right )"
which caused an error:
8<------------------------------------------------------------------
! Undefined control sequence
\strc_synonyms_insert_meaning ...urrentsynonymtag
{#2}\fastsetup
{\??simplel...
\math_left ...ame \??mathleft \meaning \nexttoken
\endcsname
\expandafter \l...
l.472 x = \left (
1 + 2 \right )
8<------------------------------------------------------------------
2.
an old document (not modified these 2 years) does no longer compile due
to apparently the same problem (not understanding `\left', `\right'.
question: my understanding is, that `context' supports "everything" out
of the box (notably equations) and there is no need for explicit loading
of additional packages? so `\left' etc. _should be defined (and it
_used_ to work 2 years ago)? what am I missing?
thx, joerg
--
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
