On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 12:36:28 -0500 Rik Kabel <cont...@rik.users.panix.com> wrote:
> Although either editor or author should be accepted, only author is > processed. There is a warning message generated by the publications > subsystem: unable to create short for 'Edited', needs one of > [author,editor] but clearly there is an editor. A reasonable > workaround is to use author instead of editor, but it would be nice > to have a fix. Editor is not a standard field for the entry @electronic. It is defined for @article, @periodical, @book, @inbook, @incollection, and @proceedings. This follows the bibtex documentation and the standard tools used for maintaining bib files. Of course, we could add this, or any other field, but I find no entry either in the APA Specifications describing this. Alan -- Alan Braslau CEA DSM-IRAMIS-SPEC CNRS UMR 3680 Orme des Merisiers 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette cedex FRANCE tel: +33 1 69 08 73 15 fax: +33 1 69 08 87 86 mailto:alan.bras...@cea.fr ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
