On 2017-02-24 19:31, Alan Braslau wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 12:36:28 -0500
Rik Kabel <cont...@rik.users.panix.com> wrote:
Although either editor or author should be accepted, only author is
processed. There is a warning message generated by the publications
subsystem: unable to create short for 'Edited', needs one of
[author,editor] but clearly there is an editor. A reasonable
workaround is to use author instead of editor, but it would be nice
to have a fix.
Editor is not a standard field for the entry @electronic.
It is defined for @article, @periodical, @book, @inbook, @incollection,
and @proceedings. This follows the bibtex documentation and the
standard tools used for maintaining bib files.
Of course, we could add this, or any other field, but I find no entry
either in the APA Specifications describing this.
Alan
Sorry. You are, of course, right about that. I misread the table in
mkiv-publications.
The problem I have is that all non-author electronic entries are grouped
at the top of the bibliography by date. However, APA for electronic
entries with no author should use the title (or a few salient words from
the text) at the beginning of the bibliography entry. Currently ConTeXt
uses a blank space and the date.
--
Rik
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
