On 2/3/20 3:28 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 2/3/2020 3:07 PM, Philipp A. wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Most text editors have LaTeX specific syntax highlighting, so it makes >> sense to give your ConTeXt file a ending it can be distinguished with. >> Is there a blessed one? >> >> * .ctx: Would mirror the semi-common .ltx, but is used for XML files >> inside of ConTeXt itself > > context ctx files are xml files indeed > >> * .mkiv: Is that just for ConTeXt or all LuaTeX stuff? Would it make >> sense to give text documents that extension? > > you can do that (or mkvi or lmtx or ...)
Since there are already *.mkxl files in the ConTeXt distribution, I think it may make sense to name the LMTX version MkXL. In any case, MkXL is simpler and clearer that MkIV with LMTX. Pablo -- http://www.ousia.tk ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
