Am 28.04.20 um 10:35 schrieb Saša Janiška: > On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 08:32:57 +0200 > "Jan U. Hasecke" <juh+ntg-cont...@mailbox.org> wrote: > >> 3. Being a writer I think that Markdown --> ConTeXt is the best way to >> achieve what I want: easy writing and professional looking books. > > I've the same opinion! > >> Up to now I used Pablos way via pandoc and XHTML described here: >> http://www.from-pandoc-to-context.tk/ > > What do you use now?
Oh I still use it. But Daves posts might offer an alternative for me. >> The problem with pandoc is that it does not generate a perfect ConTeXt >> source to build the file as some things are missing. > > You mean Pablos pandoc --> from-pandoc-to-context or Yes. juh ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
