On Thu, 28 May 2020 17:33:19 +0200 Hans Hagen <j.ha...@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> On 5/28/2020 2:49 PM, Marco Patzer wrote: > > Hi! > > > > LMTX and MkIV behave differently if dots are used in the file > > name. Example: > > > > printf '%s\n' '\starttext\null\stoptext' > foo.10.tex && context > > foo.10.tex > > > > MkIV: → foo.10.pdf > > LMTX: → foo.pdf > > > > Is this intentional? > > consider it to be so That's unfortunate. 1) The editor workflow with simple suffix replacement .tex → .pdf to open the corresponding PDF file doesn't work any more with lmtx. New logic is needed to find the correct pdf file name. 2) A project (of mine) that uses item numbers as file names (containing dots) compile to the same pdf: MkIV (everything's predictable and fine): 10.10.10.tex → 10.10.10.pdf 10.10.11.tex → 10.10.11.pdf 11.10.11.tex → 11.10.11.pdf LMTX: 10.10.10.tex → 10.10 (not even a PDF suffix) 10.10.11.tex → 10.10 (file 10.10 is over-written) 11.10.11.tex → 11.10 (no suffix) MkIV is way more predictable and consistent in that regard. Marco ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
