> Am 02.10.2021 um 10:34 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster via ntg-context 
> <ntg-context@ntg.nl>:
> 
> Rik Kabel via ntg-context schrieb am 27.09.2021 um 00:49:
>> 
>> Wolfgang (off-list),
>> 
>> It is simply wrong to say that \italicface as defined gives only \it or \bi 
>> as a result. Look at the definition. If the current fontalternative is it 
>> \it it will give a \tf result. It is sensitive to the current state in a 
>> similar way that \em and \emph are, but it will always give an italic or 
>> roman result.
>> 
> 
> If we leave the comparisons between \em and \italicface aside and talk only 
> about the results from \italicface we have a common ground.
> 
> You're right the results from \italicface aren't predictable and a fix is 
> needed but the same applies also to \boldface, \slantedface and \typeface.
> 
> Attached is the output from a modified version of the styling command (the 
> \sc column is the fallback style). \swapface is unchanged and I'm not sure 
> about its output because it uses the \em code for italic and slanted which 
> means \setupbodyfontenvironment[default][em=blue] affects also the \swapface 
> results.

Thank you very much for attacking and clarifying this! It confused me from the 
beginning...

Hraban
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to