Hi Alfredo, Any chance that you'll take a look at this issue? At least give an indication whether its a real problem or not?
Thanks, Amir On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Amir Kaduri <[email protected]> wrote: > I'll appreciate validating that the following is a real problem that I've > found: > > *Problem description:* > > When I use the tester “pfcount_multichannel” with the –r argument (i.e. > enable rss rehash), the application doesn’t receive the packets of some > sessions. > > When I remove the “-r” argument from the command line, all packets > received as expected. > > > > *Additional information:* > > 1. 1. I’m using pf_ring dev downloaded from github on 13/05/2015. > > 2. 2. The command-line I’m using is: pfcount_multichannel -i eth3 –r > > 3. 3. A sample pcap file of a single session, that I don’t receive > its packets, can be found in the following link: > https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B10Ms5GOXgCxbnJSUHNrUXhLazA&authuser=0 > > 4. 4. Machine has 24 cores. > > 5. 5. Eth3, the receiving interface, is configured to use 6 cores. > > 6. 6. Machine details: > > Linux 2.6.32-504.8.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Jan 28 21:11:36 UTC 2015 x86_64 > x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > 7. 7. Interface details: > > eth3 Ethernet controller [0200]: Intel Corporation 82599EB > 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection [8086:10fb] (rev 01) > > Subsystem: Intel Corporation Ethernet Server Adapter X520-2 [8086:000c] > MAC: 2, PHY: 12, SFP+: 6, PBA No: FFFFFF-0FF > > 8. 8. The ixgbe.ko has been loaded with RSS=6,6,6,6,6,6,6 > > 9. 9. cat /proc/net/pf_ring/info > > PF_RING Version : 6.1.0 () > > Total rings : 6 > > Standard (non DNA/ZC) Options > > Ring slots : 4096 > > Slot version : 16 > > Capture TX : Yes [RX+TX] > > IP Defragment : No > > Socket Mode : Standard > > Total plugins : 0 > > Cluster Fragment Queue : 0 > > Cluster Fragment Discard : 0 > > > > *Additional remarks:* > > 1. 1. In function pfring_hash_pkt(..) in file pfring_utils.c, the > fact that tunnel.tunneled_ip_src.v6.s6_addr32[0] is missing, looks like a > bug. > > 2. 2. By reviewing the code, it looks that the functions > hash_pkt_header(..) + hash_pkt(..) in file pf_ring.c, and function > pfring_hash_pkt(..) in file pfring_utils.c, can somehow be unified. > > > Regards, > > Amir > > > >
_______________________________________________ Ntop-misc mailing list [email protected] http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
