Thank you Alfredo for your response. Soon I'll test again with latest code.

Amir

On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Alfredo Cardigliano <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Amir
> sorry I didn’t have the testbed for testing this before,
> I ran some test with your traffic and your configuration (actually I used
> 8 RSS queues) and I am able to receive all traffic with
> pfcount_multichannel -r. Please try with latest code.
>
> Best Regards
> Alfredo
>
> On 02 Jun 2015, at 08:25, Amir Kaduri <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Alfredo,
>
> Any chance that you'll take a look at this issue? At least give an
> indication whether its a real problem or not?
>
> Thanks,
> Amir
>
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Amir Kaduri <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I'll appreciate validating that the following is a real problem that I've
>> found:
>>
>> *Problem description:*
>>
>> When I use the tester “pfcount_multichannel” with the –r argument (i.e.
>> enable rss rehash), the application doesn’t receive the packets of some
>> sessions.
>>
>> When I remove the “-r” argument from the command line, all packets
>> received as expected.
>>
>>
>> *Additional information:*
>>
>> 1.       1. I’m using pf_ring dev downloaded from github on 13/05/2015.
>>
>> 2.       2. The command-line I’m using is: pfcount_multichannel -i eth3
>> –r
>>
>> 3.       3. A sample pcap file of a single session, that I don’t receive
>> its packets, can be found in the following link:
>> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B10Ms5GOXgCxbnJSUHNrUXhLazA&authuser=0
>>
>> 4.       4. Machine has 24 cores.
>>
>> 5.       5. Eth3, the receiving interface, is configured to use 6 cores.
>>
>> 6.       6. Machine details:
>>
>> Linux 2.6.32-504.8.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Jan 28 21:11:36 UTC 2015
>> x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>
>> 7.       7. Interface details:
>>
>> eth3       Ethernet controller [0200]: Intel Corporation 82599EB
>> 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection [8086:10fb] (rev 01)
>>
>> Subsystem: Intel Corporation Ethernet Server Adapter X520-2 [8086:000c]
>> MAC: 2, PHY: 12, SFP+: 6, PBA No: FFFFFF-0FF
>>
>> 8.       8. The ixgbe.ko has been loaded with RSS=6,6,6,6,6,6,6
>>
>> 9.       9. cat /proc/net/pf_ring/info
>>
>> PF_RING Version          : 6.1.0 ()
>>
>> Total rings              : 6
>>
>> Standard (non DNA/ZC) Options
>>
>> Ring slots               : 4096
>>
>> Slot version             : 16
>>
>> Capture TX               : Yes [RX+TX]
>>
>> IP Defragment            : No
>>
>> Socket Mode              : Standard
>>
>> Total plugins            : 0
>>
>> Cluster Fragment Queue   : 0
>>
>> Cluster Fragment Discard : 0
>>
>>
>> *Additional remarks:*
>>
>> 1.      1.  In function pfring_hash_pkt(..) in file pfring_utils.c, the
>> fact that tunnel.tunneled_ip_src.v6.s6_addr32[0] is missing, looks like a
>> bug.
>>
>> 2.       2. By reviewing the code, it looks that the functions
>> hash_pkt_header(..) + hash_pkt(..) in file pf_ring.c, and function
>> pfring_hash_pkt(..) in file pfring_utils.c, can somehow be unified.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Amir
>>
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Ntop-misc mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ntop-misc mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
>
_______________________________________________
Ntop-misc mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc

Reply via email to