> On 16 Nov 2015, at 10:53, Amir Kaduri <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Alfredo,
> 
>  
> I reviewed the implementation of the feature (great!) and I would like to 
> clarify please:
> 
> 1. If I understood it correctly, the number of matched packets is per given 
> rule, while the number of missed packets is per ring (and not per the given 
> rule). Is it correct, or am I wrong?
> 
>      If I’m correct, can I provide a dummy rule and get the number of missed 
> packets on the given ring?
> 
Correct
> 2. When reading “ethtool –S ethX | grep fdir_miss” or “ethtool –S ethX | grep 
> fdir_match” you actually get the aggregation of missed/matched packets on the 
> interface (ethX).
> 
>      Is it possible to get the pf_ring statistics aggregated as well, per 
> interface, or at least per ring?
> 
Is it ok for you if we write this stats under /proc instead of adding another 
API call?

Alfredo

>  
> Thanks,
> 
> Amir
> 
> 
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Alfredo Cardigliano <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>> On 11 Nov 2015, at 18:02, Amir Kaduri <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> Two following questions please:
>> 1. fdir_miss (of ethtool -S) continues to increase even if my process 
>> doesn't apply the filter rules. Do you know what else causes it to increase 
>> if its not a result of a filter?
>> I didn't find an answer for it in the following doc: 
>> https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networking/ixgbe.txt 
>> <https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networking/ixgbe.txt>
> Please have a look at the datasheet for all cases.
> 
>> 2. Should I expect the mentioned feature request to be implemented in 
>> pf_ring soon, or its most probably be there with many other prioritized 
>> requests?
> 
> It is in queue with other feature requests, we handle them in best effort,
> however I think it will not require too much (1-2 weeks at most)
> 
> Alfredo
> 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Amir
>> 
>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Amir Kaduri <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> Thanks for the answer. It looks to me very essential statistics for 
>> user-space applications.
>> Github feature request: https://github.com/ntop/PF_RING/issues/52 
>> <https://github.com/ntop/PF_RING/issues/52>
>> 
>> Amir
>> 
>> 
>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 7:34 PM, Alfredo Cardigliano <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> Hi Amir
>> there is no statistics by default (unless you code your own kernel plugin 
>> and read stats via pfring_get_hash_filtering_rule_stats, but this is 
>> overkilling for match/miss counters),
>> please open a feature request on github.
>> 
>> Alfredo
>> 
>>> On 09 Nov 2015, at 18:28, Amir Kaduri <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> In my application, I’m using pf_ring hash software filters (API: 
>>> pfring_handle_hash_filtering_rule()).
>>> 
>>> How can I get statistics info regarding the quantity of the filtered 
>>> packets?
>>> 
>>> I know that on ixgbe module, I can get the following parameters when using 
>>> ethtool –s <interface>:
>>> 
>>> fdir_match, fdir_miss, fdir_overflow.
>>> 
>>> Are there any pf_ring user-space APIs to get these parameters? Any code 
>>> examples?
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Amir
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ntop-misc mailing list
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc 
>>> <http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc>
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ntop-misc mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc 
>> <http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc>
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ntop-misc mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc 
>> <http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ntop-misc mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc 
> <http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ntop-misc mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc

_______________________________________________
Ntop-misc mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc

Reply via email to