Added to git code, please note stats are per socket, not per interface.

Alfredo

> On 16 Nov 2015, at 13:48, Amir Kaduri <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Alfredo,
> 
> Having it per interface under /proc is excellent.
> 
> Thanks,
> Amir
> 
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Alfredo Cardigliano <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>> On 16 Nov 2015, at 10:53, Amir Kaduri <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Alfredo,
>> 
>>  
>> I reviewed the implementation of the feature (great!) and I would like to 
>> clarify please:
>> 
>> 1. If I understood it correctly, the number of matched packets is per given 
>> rule, while the number of missed packets is per ring (and not per the given 
>> rule). Is it correct, or am I wrong?
>> 
>>      If I’m correct, can I provide a dummy rule and get the number of missed 
>> packets on the given ring?
>> 
> Correct
>> 2. When reading “ethtool –S ethX | grep fdir_miss” or “ethtool –S ethX | 
>> grep fdir_match” you actually get the aggregation of missed/matched packets 
>> on the interface (ethX).
>> 
>>      Is it possible to get the pf_ring statistics aggregated as well, per 
>> interface, or at least per ring?
>> 
> Is it ok for you if we write this stats under /proc instead of adding another 
> API call?
> 
> Alfredo
> 
>>  
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Amir
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Alfredo Cardigliano <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 11 Nov 2015, at 18:02, Amir Kaduri <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Two following questions please:
>>> 1. fdir_miss (of ethtool -S) continues to increase even if my process 
>>> doesn't apply the filter rules. Do you know what else causes it to increase 
>>> if its not a result of a filter?
>>> I didn't find an answer for it in the following doc: 
>>> https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networking/ixgbe.txt 
>>> <https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networking/ixgbe.txt>
>> Please have a look at the datasheet for all cases.
>> 
>>> 2. Should I expect the mentioned feature request to be implemented in 
>>> pf_ring soon, or its most probably be there with many other prioritized 
>>> requests?
>> 
>> It is in queue with other feature requests, we handle them in best effort,
>> however I think it will not require too much (1-2 weeks at most)
>> 
>> Alfredo
>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Amir
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Amir Kaduri <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> Thanks for the answer. It looks to me very essential statistics for 
>>> user-space applications.
>>> Github feature request: https://github.com/ntop/PF_RING/issues/52 
>>> <https://github.com/ntop/PF_RING/issues/52>
>>> 
>>> Amir
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 7:34 PM, Alfredo Cardigliano <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> Hi Amir
>>> there is no statistics by default (unless you code your own kernel plugin 
>>> and read stats via pfring_get_hash_filtering_rule_stats, but this is 
>>> overkilling for match/miss counters),
>>> please open a feature request on github.
>>> 
>>> Alfredo
>>> 
>>>> On 09 Nov 2015, at 18:28, Amir Kaduri <[email protected] 
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> In my application, I’m using pf_ring hash software filters (API: 
>>>> pfring_handle_hash_filtering_rule()).
>>>> 
>>>> How can I get statistics info regarding the quantity of the filtered 
>>>> packets?
>>>> 
>>>> I know that on ixgbe module, I can get the following parameters when using 
>>>> ethtool –s <interface>:
>>>> 
>>>> fdir_match, fdir_miss, fdir_overflow.
>>>> 
>>>> Are there any pf_ring user-space APIs to get these parameters? Any code 
>>>> examples?
>>>> 
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> 
>>>> Amir
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Ntop-misc mailing list
>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc 
>>>> <http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc>
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ntop-misc mailing list
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc 
>>> <http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ntop-misc mailing list
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc 
>>> <http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc>
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ntop-misc mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc 
>> <http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc>
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ntop-misc mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc 
>> <http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ntop-misc mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc 
> <http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ntop-misc mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc

_______________________________________________
Ntop-misc mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc

Reply via email to