Cheers for the reply gents.  Getting a couple of x520s ordered.

Appreciated,

Luke

On 24/02/16 13:22, Alfredo Cardigliano wrote:
Hi Luke
it is strange it does not support promiscuous mode, it is based on standard 
Intel 82599 chipset, it should work in promiscuous mode.
Anyway I would recommend 82599/X520 for 10Gbit, X710 has poor buffering power per 
queue (<8K packets) with respect to 82599/X520 (32K packets).

Alfredo

On 23 Feb 2016, at 12:58, Whitworth, Luke <[email protected]> 
wrote:

Hi all,

I'm trying to source a card for my HP server to allow me to capture from some 
10G fiber using PF_RING ZC.  Was looking at HP Ethernet 10Gb 2-port 560SFP+ 
Adapter 
(http://www8.hp.com/uk/en/products/iss-adapters/product-detail.html?oid=5283369)
 which ticks all the boxes, but then stumbled upon 
https://www.intelethernet-hp.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/8954-HP_Intel-Ethernet-Data-SheetFINAL.pdf
 which on page 5 suggests that this NIC can't be used in promiscuous mode which 
makes it kind of useless if it's true!

Does anyone have any experience with this NIC?  If so is the no promiscuous 
mode true?  If so does anyone have any alternative they'd recommend given that 
the card needs to be Intel 82599/X540/X710 based.

Cheers,

Luke
_______________________________________________
Ntop-misc mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc


_______________________________________________
Ntop-misc mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc

--
Luke Whitworth
Business Technologies Specialist, Information Services
Building 63, Cranfield University, Cranfield, Bedfordshire MK43 0AL
W: www.cranfield.ac.uk  E: [email protected]
T: +44 (0) 1234 750111 x3556
This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended only for the named addressee. If you are not the named addressee, please accept our apology, notify the sender immediately and then delete the email. We request that you do not disclose, use, copy or distribute any information within it.
Any opinions expressed are not necessarily the corporate view of Cranfield 
University. This email is not intended to be contractually binding unless 
specifically stated and the sender is an authorised University signatory.
Whilst we have taken steps to ensure that this email and all attachments are 
free from any virus, we advise that, in keeping with good computing practice, 
the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free.

_______________________________________________
Ntop-misc mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc

Reply via email to