Thanks Alfredo,

If I’m reading this correctly, eth2 has 12 Tx and Rx queues while eth7 has 1 
each:

root@pgen:/home/jlixfeld/PF_RING/drivers/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe-4.1.5-zc/src# cat 
/proc/net/pf_ring/dev/eth2/info
Name:              eth2
Index:             86
Address:           00:0C:BD:08:80:98
Polling Mode:      NAPI/ZC
Type:              Ethernet
Family:            Intel ixgbe 82599
Max # TX Queues:   12
# Used RX Queues:  12
Num RX Slots:      32768
Num TX Slots:      32768
root@pgen:/home/jlixfeld/PF_RING/drivers/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe-4.1.5-zc/src# cat 
/proc/net/pf_ring/dev/eth7/info
Name:              eth7
Index:             83
Address:           00:0C:BD:08:80:9D
Polling Mode:      NAPI/ZC
Type:              Ethernet
Family:            Intel ixgbe 82599
Max # TX Queues:   1
# Used RX Queues:  1
Num RX Slots:      32768
Num TX Slots:      32768
root@pgen:/home/jlixfeld/PF_RING/drivers/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe-4.1.5-zc/src#

load_driver.sh seems to be set to disable multi queue so I’m not quite sure how 
this got this way, or how to correct it?

root@pgen:/home/jlixfeld/PF_RING/drivers/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe-4.1.5-zc/src# grep 
-i rss load_driver.sh
#insmod ./ixgbe.ko RSS=0,0,0,0
insmod ./ixgbe.ko RSS=1,1,1,1
#insmod ./ixgbe.ko RSS=1,1,1,1 low_latency_tx=1
#insmod ./ixgbe.ko MQ=1,1,1,1 RSS=16,16,16,16
#insmod ./ixgbe.ko RSS=1,1,1,1 FdirPballoc=3,3,3,3
#insmod ./ixgbe.ko RSS=1,1,1,1 numa_cpu_affinity=0,0,0,0
root@pgen:/home/jlixfeld/PF_RING/drivers/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe-4.1.5-zc/src#

> On Jun 8, 2016, at 3:55 PM, Alfredo Cardigliano <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jason
> no problem, I was able to read something :-)
> Please check that both the interfaces are configured with a single RSS queue 
> (take a look at /proc/net/pf_ring/dev/eth2/info)
> 
> Alfredo
> 
>> On 08 Jun 2016, at 21:09, Jason Lixfeld <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> My gosh! I’m so sorry for the way this is formatted. My mailer insists that 
>> this message was sent in plain-text, not whatever the heck this is!
>> 
>> I’m sorry this is so impossible to read :(
>> 
>> On Jun 8, 2016, at 3:05 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> My first run through with poring. :)
>> 
>> I’ve compiled the zc variant of pfring in an attempt to get linerate between 
>> two of the ports which are looped together.
>> 
>> The NIC is a 6 port 82599 based one.
>> 
>> root@pgen:/home/jlixfeld/PF_RING/drivers/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe-4.1.5-zc/src# 
>> ./load_driver.sh irqbalance: no process found Configuring eth6 IFACE CORE 
>> MASK -> FILE ======================= eth6 0 1 -> /proc/irq/87/smp_affinity 
>> Configuring eth7 IFACE CORE MASK -> FILE ======================= eth7 0 1 -> 
>> /proc/irq/89/smp_affinity Configuring eth2 IFACE CORE MASK -> FILE 
>> ======================= eth2 0 1 -> /proc/irq/96/smp_affinity eth2 1 2 -> 
>> /proc/irq/97/smp_affinity eth2 2 4 -> /proc/irq/98/smp_affinity eth2 3 8 -> 
>> /proc/irq/99/smp_affinity eth2 4 10 -> /proc/irq/100/smp_affinity eth2 5 20 
>> -> /proc/irq/101/smp_affinity eth2 6 40 -> /proc/irq/102/smp_affinity eth2 7 
>> 80 -> /proc/irq/103/smp_affinity eth2 8 100 -> /proc/irq/104/smp_affinity 
>> eth2 9 200 -> /proc/irq/105/smp_affinity eth2 10 400 -> 
>> /proc/irq/106/smp_affinity eth2 11 800 -> /proc/irq/107/smp_affinity 
>> Configuring eth3 IFACE CORE MASK -> FILE ======================= eth3 0 1 -> 
>> /proc/irq/109/smp_affinity eth3 1 2 -> /proc/irq/110/smp_affinity eth3 2 4 
>> -> /proc/irq/111/smp_affinity eth3 3 8 -> /proc/irq/112/smp_affinity eth3 4 
>> 10 -> /proc/irq/113/smp_affinity eth3 5 20 -> /proc/irq/114/smp_affinity 
>> eth3 6 40 -> /proc/irq/115/smp_affinity eth3 7 80 -> 
>> /proc/irq/116/smp_affinity eth3 8 100 -> /proc/irq/117/smp_affinity eth3 9 
>> 200 -> /proc/irq/118/smp_affinity eth3 10 400 -> /proc/irq/119/smp_affinity 
>> eth3 11 800 -> /proc/irq/120/smp_affinity Configuring eth4 IFACE CORE MASK 
>> -> FILE ======================= eth4 0 1 -> /proc/irq/91/smp_affinity 
>> Configuring eth5 IFACE CORE MASK -> FILE ======================= eth5 0 1 -> 
>> /proc/irq/93/smp_affinity 
>> root@pgen:/home/jlixfeld/PF_RING/drivers/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe-4.1.5-zc/src#
>> 
>> My issue is that I only get 10Gbps in one direction. If zc:eth7 is the 
>> sender, zc:eth2 only sees Rx @ 0.54Gbps:
>> 
>> root@pgen:/home/jlixfeld/PF_RING/userland/examples_zc# ./zsend -i zc:eth7 -c 
>> 2
>> 
>> Absolute Stats: 111'707'057 pkts – 9'383'392'788 bytes Actual Stats: 
>> 13'983'520.42 pps – 9.40 Gbps [1133946996 bytes / 1.0 sec]
>> 
>> root@pgen:/home/jlixfeld/PF_RING/userland/examples_zc# ./zcount -i zc:eth2 
>> -c 1
>> 
>> Absolute Stats: 5'699'096 pkts (33'135'445 drops) – 478'724'064 bytes Actual 
>> Stats: 802'982.00 pps (4'629'316.93 drops) – 0.54 Gbps
>> 
>> But, if zc:eth2 is the sender, zc:eth7 sees rates more in-line with what 
>> zc:eth2 is sending.
>> 
>> root@pgen:/home/jlixfeld/PF_RING/userland/examples_zc# ./zsend -i zc:eth2 -c 
>> 2
>> 
>> Absolute Stats: 28'285'274 pkts – 2'375'963'016 bytes Actual Stats: 
>> 14'114'355.24 pps – 9.48 Gbps [1185800280 bytes / 1.0 sec]
>> 
>> root@pgen:/home/jlixfeld/PF_RING/userland/examples_zc# ./zcount -i zc:eth7 
>> -c 1
>> 
>> Absolute Stats: 28'007'460 pkts (0 drops) – 2'352'626'640 bytes Actual 
>> Stats: 14'044'642.54 pps (0.00 drops) – 9.44 Gbps
>> 
>> I’ve done some reading, but I haven’t found anything that has pointed me 
>> towards a possible reason why this is happening. I’m wondering if anyone has 
>> any thoughts?
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> _____________________________________________ Ntop-misc mailing list 
>> [email protected] 
>> https://u3172041.ct.sendgrid.net/wf/click?upn=UmVayPZKpIdftgoYx-2BU88-2B1jnUM7Rvx0OUKMS78f3Zn78u-2BsRXpXcIeS3oh8u5YEWIgu-2BvmYwr4GzDvZ-2FfPGPw-3D-3D_rhOy4YLBxOPOohPdjw4-2BtC7rnGr1J9pkUkX-2FFAaRhBN4vIfRS7DIDklXWy9R3sJqsweQ147Rx8q-2FqgH7zvE5KtOdJYcbDbLTnShT5EInEX-2BxHT1GAAM64960-2FtUYERvwWVli0JEDodseHEb2XBr17oUR7hYaSZUVqcP79goBSUa3gGpBzLUKJR152g3V5ddBIKNj8a-2BksuTO1mMQP-2BJqKOkiIMD2oifWJGuGGmsqbtg-3D
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ntop-misc mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://u3172041.ct.sendgrid.net/wf/click?upn=UmVayPZKpIdftgoYx-2BU88-2B1jnUM7Rvx0OUKMS78f3Zn78u-2BsRXpXcIeS3oh8u5YEWIgu-2BvmYwr4GzDvZ-2FfPGPw-3D-3D_rhOy4YLBxOPOohPdjw4-2BtC7rnGr1J9pkUkX-2FFAaRhBN4vIfRS7DIDklXWy9R3sJqsweQ147Rx8q-2FqgH7zvE5Kj3idwxsLvv-2BAEVjDj5UORJ0EJ6nGu5pY9Uj0-2BXs00gfHAOu5LNDWs4Rao1hk7FX-2FWq-2B8krhIB-2BH2C-2Bb82v975qQDGCd06bPGpq1wwWJh7QA3Hm0oM81OXL5hKvIWMJFm0LqXClfIQbufnCl7bjqTc4-3D
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ntop-misc mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://u3172041.ct.sendgrid.net/wf/click?upn=UmVayPZKpIdftgoYx-2BU88-2B1jnUM7Rvx0OUKMS78f3Zn78u-2BsRXpXcIeS3oh8u5YEWIgu-2BvmYwr4GzDvZ-2FfPGPw-3D-3D_rhOy4YLBxOPOohPdjw4-2BtC7rnGr1J9pkUkX-2FFAaRhBN4vIfRS7DIDklXWy9R3sJqsweQ147Rx8q-2FqgH7zvE5KmTFOi1LOQ3h7nSPdn3hj3oEr5izae6i0ZG7aFFWl8UlpuCaLmSe-2FoJh7KiqyEW4tBH8kKCU4W0qmzxpGtgZV94fF5Zdz4o7-2BiwJ60eiy5jgHydVIgGVcKyvTSyLHrbLyvPhTCN3YMkldLCnGelO4Iw-3D

_______________________________________________
Ntop-misc mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc

Reply via email to