Michael
you have ~92 flows/sec that is a bit too much for sqlite in its current 
implementation. Thanks for the feed back, we have some homework on our side

Luca


On 13 Oct 2014, at 23:32, Michael Pollock <[email protected]> wrote:

> I retrieved the following from the Cacti FlowView Summary screen.  I put in 
> the timeframe going from 14:00 to 14:05 today.
>  
> Total Flows                          27,611
> Total Packets                        5,851,868
> Duration of data (realtime)          343
> Average flow time (1/1000 secs)      315,311,552
> Average flow size (octets)           129,865
> Average flows / second (flow)        28
> Average Kbits / second (flow)        29,391
> Total Octets                         3,585,696,719
> Total Time (1/1000 secs) (flows)     8,706,066,882,992
> Duration of data (1/1000 secs)       976,000
> Average packet size (octets)         613
> Average packets per flow              212
> Average flows / second (real)        80
> Average Kbits / second (real)        83,631
>  
>  
> 
> Michael Pollock
> Systems Engineer
> 
> <image001.gif>
> 4400 River Green Parkway, Suite 100
> Duluth, GA 30096
> 
> Mobile: 678-520-0672
> [email protected]
> www.possiblenow.com
> 
>  
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Pollock
> Sent: Monday, October 13, 2014 5:07 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Lorenzo Mangani
> Subject: Re: [Ntop] How to reduce size of historical interface database
>  
> How could I determine that?  Do I need to enable the historical interface 
> temporarily?
>  
> I added the Cacti FlowView plugin as another destination from nProbe (along 
> with -a so both tools get all the data) and I can get the data from there, 
> but I’d prefer a more user-friendly interface like ntopng for others to be 
> able to view the data.
>  
>  
> 
> Michael Pollock
> Systems Engineer
> 
> <image001.gif>
> 4400 River Green Parkway, Suite 100
> Duluth, GA 30096
> 
> Mobile: 678-520-0672
> [email protected]
> www.possiblenow.com
> 
>  
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Luca Deri
> Sent: Monday, October 13, 2014 2:59 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Lorenzo Mangani
> Subject: Re: [Ntop] How to reduce size of historical interface database
>  
> Michael,
> just to size the problem, how many flows ntopng generates every 5 minutes?
>  
> What you are asking is close to what we had in mind. i think that with some 
> further iteration we can come up with a precise list of requirements
>  
> Cheers Luca
>  
> On 13 Oct 2014, at 18:22, Michael Pollock <[email protected]> wrote:
>  
> 
> Say I click on the interface (tcp://*:5556).  If I then click the tab for 
> “historical activity”, I see a graph of how much was being used over a period 
> of time, which is what I expect.  But next to that is “Protocols”.  I’d love 
> to keep that data somehow, too.  Also, you added a magnifying glass next to 
> each protocol.  If I click that, I only get taken to “active flows”.  I have 
> some that have many TB of data over time. I’d like to be able to go back and 
> see what was using that data and when. 
>  
> For example, we have a minor bit of slowness in our development network 
> around 2:00pm every day.  I can’t figure out exactly how to find what was 
> using all the bandwidth during that time without using a historical 
> interface, but unfortunately that takes up so much data that it’s basically 
> unusable for me.
>  
> Thanks!
>  
>  
> Michael Pollock
> Systems Engineer
> 
> <image001.gif>
> 4400 River Green Parkway, Suite 100
> Duluth, GA 30096
> 
> Mobile: 678-520-0672
> [email protected]
> www.possiblenow.com
>  
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Luca Deri
> Sent: Monday, October 13, 2014 7:16 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Ntop] How to reduce size of historical interface database
>  
> Michael,
> if you have this traffic increase then you have a lot of traffic to monitor. 
> is this the case? What would you like to save exactly?
> 
> We have started to add ElasticSearch support in ntopng, and this is another 
> option to use instead of SQlite. But all these are experiments until we find 
> a solution we like.
> 
> Does anyone has a suggestion perhaps?
> 
> Regards Luca
> 
> On 10/10/2014 05:44 PM, Michael Pollock wrote:
> I enabled the historical interface, but the database was growing at about 1 
> GB every 5 minutes.  Is there any way to reduce this? 
>  
> It looks like SQLite (which I am not familiar with, unfortunately) is just a 
> series of plain text files.  Is there any way to compress this or just store 
> the overall usage data?  Without historical data, this utility isn’t nearly 
> as useful.
>  
> Thanks for anyone who can offer a suggestion!
>  
>  
> Michael Pollock
> Systems Engineer
> 
> <image001.gif>
> 4400 River Green Parkway, Suite 100
> Duluth, GA 30096
> 
> Mobile: 678-520-0672
> [email protected]
> www.possiblenow.com
>  
> The information contained in this communication is confidential, is intended 
> only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally privileged. 
> If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
> notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this 
> communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
> in error, please resend this communication to the sender and delete the 
> original message or any copy of it from your computer system
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ntop mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
>  
> The information contained in this communication is confidential, is intended 
> only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally privileged. 
> If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
> notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this 
> communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
> in error, please resend this communication to the sender and delete the 
> original message or any copy of it from your computer system
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ntop mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
>  
> The information contained in this communication is confidential, is intended 
> only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally privileged. 
> If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
> notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this 
> communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
> in error, please resend this communication to the sender and delete the 
> original message or any copy of it from your computer system
> 
> The information contained in this communication is confidential, is intended 
> only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally privileged. 
> If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
> notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this 
> communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
> in error, please resend this communication to the sender and delete the 
> original message or any copy of it from your computer system
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ntop mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop

_______________________________________________
Ntop mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop

Reply via email to