Ok - I'll defer to your judgment here. However, you should probably put an explicit test in for gd2... there's a model in LINUXsuse - find something unique about the ports/gd2 package and test for it, with a warning if it's not found.
-----Burton > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > Julien TOUCHE > Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 9:36 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Ntop] Configure problem on OpenBSD 3.4 (gdImageDestroy()) > > > > not sure it is the good way > why use gd2 (which is not in ports tree) ? it works well with 1.8 (which > has a port). > > i test it and it seems compiling ok > (i don't even see the difference when compiling in port ... or it must > do something visible ?) > > --- configureextra/openbsd.orig 2004-04-09 16:20:04.000000000 +0200 > +++ configureextra/openbsd 2004-04-09 16:20:21.000000000 +0200 > @@ -6,3 +6,7 @@ SO_VERSION_PATCH=.0.0 > # This is probably not right, but we can't seem to settle on what IS > right... > MAKE_SHARED_LIBRARY_PARM="-shared" > > +. configureextra/functions > + > +# Test for GNU libiconv (e.g. SunFreeware) > +test_library iconv iconv_open > > note: michael could you test the last port release i send, without any > extra patch (just untar, cd, make install) and report if it works ok > (you will need openbsd ports tree (ports.tar.gz from cd)) > > _______________________________________________ > Ntop mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop _______________________________________________ Ntop mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
