OK... then nevermind. ntop works fine w/ gd 1.8.x or gd 2.0.x -- you just have to be consistent and use only a single version. This causes problems w/ some OS/distributions which include both and try to be clever about it. ntop doesn't like clever.
-----Burton > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > Julien TOUCHE > Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 2:50 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Ntop] Configure problem on OpenBSD 3.4 (gdImageDestroy()) > > > Burton M. Strauss III wrote: > > However, you should probably put an explicit test in for gd2... > > there's a model in LINUXsuse - find something unique about the > > ports/gd2 package and test for it, with a warning if it's not found. > > for now, there is no ports of gd2 on openbsd, and so, in depends, i have > only gd (wich is 1.8.3). i don't remember ntop docs saying it > requires gd2. > Michael compiles it from src maybe because he thinks it was mandatory > which is not the case. > > normally, default openbsd user, will use ports (but for now, i don't get > extra return from my post to ports@) > > there is no need to use something else than ports for compiling > dependencies of ntop (except maybe gdome if you need xmldump, as there > is no port for it; that's why openbsd flavor is mark broken). On each > system, use tools you get (like apt on debian, ...) and after either > improve tools, either do it at hand > > Regards > > Julien > _______________________________________________ > Ntop mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop _______________________________________________ Ntop mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
