And if it's about the eth0 interface? On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 03:07:51PM -0500, Burton M. Strauss III wrote: > If data is coming in via netFlow, there is a "Flow Aggregation" option which > includes PORTS as one of the choices. > > -----Burton > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > > thefly > > Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 3:02 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [Ntop] tcp udp ports > > > > > > Hello everybody, > > i've got the necessity to monitor all the possible range of ports for > > both udp and tcp. The natural questions are: > > a) is it possibile to make it monitor and dump on rrd the traffic of ALL > > the ports for both TCP and UDP without filling the whole protocol.list > > file with the whole port range? > > b) traffic to ports is dumped to file like IP_<protocolname>.rrd in the > > interface's dir. What about TCP and UDP traffic? i'd like them > > separated. > > > > TIA > > -- > > Claudio "thefly" Martella > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > GNU/PG keyid: 0x8EA95625 > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ntop mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop > >
--
Claudio "thefly" Martella
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GNU/PG keyid: 0x8EA95625
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Ntop mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
