Nope > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > thefly > Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 3:31 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Ntop] tcp udp ports > > > And if it's about the eth0 interface? > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 03:07:51PM -0500, Burton M. Strauss III wrote: > > If data is coming in via netFlow, there is a "Flow Aggregation" > option which > > includes PORTS as one of the choices. > > > > -----Burton > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > > > thefly > > > Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 3:02 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: [Ntop] tcp udp ports > > > > > > > > > Hello everybody, > > > i've got the necessity to monitor all the possible range of ports for > > > both udp and tcp. The natural questions are: > > > a) is it possibile to make it monitor and dump on rrd the > traffic of ALL > > > the ports for both TCP and UDP without filling the whole protocol.list > > > file with the whole port range? > > > b) traffic to ports is dumped to file like > IP_<protocolname>.rrd in the > > > interface's dir. What about TCP and UDP traffic? i'd like them > > > separated. > > > > > > TIA > > > -- > > > Claudio "thefly" Martella > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > GNU/PG keyid: 0x8EA95625 > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Ntop mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop > > > > > > -- > Claudio "thefly" Martella > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > GNU/PG keyid: 0x8EA95625 >
_______________________________________________ Ntop mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
