> Yes - I'm a little familiar with IPFIX. I thought it's been around long > enough to support the v5 record format. I had some problem with Netflow > v9 and nTop. Went to v5 and it seems to be better, but I made other > changes at the same time so not sure if it was only a v9 issue or not.
Well, I have recently received answer from one of network engineers, whose company is trying to sell those switches to us. According to him, Nortel's IPFIX implementation is fully compatibile with NetFlow v9 format. Assuming this is correct, and taking under consideration what you have just said, it could be that known issue with nTop and NetFlow v9 implementation. The only problem is that I do not have possibility to switch to v5, like on Catalyst. > I would definitely capture the flows and make sure they are formatted > "correctly". At least that will help you narrow it down to a Nortel or > nTop issue. That is exactly what I'm intending to do, with Luca's help. Regards, Krzysztof Ksiazek _______________________________________________ Ntop mailing list [email protected] http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
