Krzysztof I will look at the trace you sent me and let you know. FYI the next version of nProbe (it's almost ready) has the ability to act as a netflow/IPFIX proxy (e.g. you emit records in IPFIX and let nprobe convert them to v5/v9 and send them to your netflow collector) with all combinations supported (e.g. v9->ipfix, v5->v9 etc). In the meantime I need to fix the problem you reported.
Cheers, Luca Krzysztof Książek wrote: >> Yes - I'm a little familiar with IPFIX. I thought it's been around long >> enough to support the v5 record format. I had some problem with Netflow >> v9 and nTop. Went to v5 and it seems to be better, but I made other >> changes at the same time so not sure if it was only a v9 issue or not. >> > > Well, I have recently received answer from one of network engineers, > whose company is trying to sell those switches to us. According to > him, Nortel's IPFIX implementation is fully compatibile with NetFlow > v9 format. Assuming this is correct, and taking under consideration > what you have just said, it could be that known issue with nTop and > NetFlow v9 implementation. The only problem is that I do not have > possibility to switch to v5, like on Catalyst. > > >> I would definitely capture the flows and make sure they are formatted >> "correctly". At least that will help you narrow it down to a Nortel or >> nTop issue. >> > > That is exactly what I'm intending to do, with Luca's help. > > Regards, > Krzysztof Ksiazek > _______________________________________________ > Ntop mailing list > [email protected] > http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop > -- Luca Deri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://luca.ntop.org/ skype://lucaderi/ Don't be encumbered by past history. Go off and do something wonderful - Robert Noyce _______________________________________________ Ntop mailing list [email protected] http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
