What is your rrd config and options?

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Brock Kuhse
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 9:15 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Ntop] Segfault on Fedora 8

Well, I'm still getting segfaults, just less often (about every two or
three
days instead of every 2-30 minutes).  It's still enough to make it
difficult
to collect the data the client is looking for, but obviously a lot
better
than every couple minutes.

I've just checked out and compiled the latest SVN build, so we'll see
how it
goes...

- Brock

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
> Gary Gatten
> Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 10:39 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Ntop] Segfault on Fedora 8
> 
> LOL - I like random "messing around" - but just like with code, it
> usually causes more trouble than it's worth! ;-)
> 
> Glad it seems to work for now.  Keep us posted if you notice any odd
> behavior as a result.
> 
> Gary
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
> Brock Kuhse
> Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 9:40 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Ntop] Segfault on Fedora 8
> 
> > > Other than that - not sure if I can help much.  Maybe check out
> line
> > > 6551 in util.c (and adjacent lines) and see what that block of
code
> > > is trying to do.
> 
> Well, after some random "messing around" with the code, I just
> commented
> out
> the two lines comprising the else{} block in util.c that includes line
> 6551:
> 
>   } else {
>     /* Insert in chain */
>     /*newPort->next = prev->next;
>     prev->next = newPort;*/
>   }
> 
> The periodic segfault problem seems to have gone away.  I've read
> through
> the comments around this section (particularly the comment block about
> 20
> lines up), but still really have no real idea of what it does.
> 
> If anyone out there has a better understanding of the code, I'd
> certainly
> like to know the consequences of this.
> 
> I'm sure removing this chunk of code will break something, but will I
> miss
> it? :)
> 
> - Brock
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ntop mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> <font size="1">
> <div style='border:none;border-bottom:double windowtext
> 2.25pt;padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in'>
> </div>
> "This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient
>  and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential.
>  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
>  any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email
>  and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited.  If you have
>  received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by
>  return email and delete this email from your system."
> </font>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ntop mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop

_______________________________________________
Ntop mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop





<font size="1">
<div style='border:none;border-bottom:double windowtext 2.25pt;padding:0in 0in 
1.0pt 0in'>
</div>
"This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient
 and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential.
 If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
 any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email
 and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited.  If you have
 received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by
 return email and delete this email from your system."
</font>

_______________________________________________
Ntop mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop

Reply via email to