Gary Gatten wrote:
> I also had some "apparent" increased stability when using -K. I set
> this arg to help in the debugging and then the darn thing wouldn't crash
> anymore! I didn't have stringent control processes so I'm sure I made
> other changes, but I haven't had a chance to prove/disprove if -K truly
> helps stabilize anything.
>
> G
>
Running -K without deleting the db's produces trace below
Tue Aug 26 21:15:27 2008 **ERROR** Bad magic number
(expected=1968/real=0) getNextHost()[address.c/52]
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread -1354310736 (LWP 24979)]
0xb7953d6c in __getFirstHost (actualDeviceId=0, beginIdx=<value
optimized out>,
file=0xb79747cc "address.c", line=52) at util.c:67
67 if(broadcastHost(el) || (el == myGlobals.otherHostEntry)) {
(gdb)
--
ian
_______________________________________________
Ntop mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
