I see it as my responsibility as I.T. and network administrator to respond
to questionable requests and object when I disagree. 

 

Regards, 
Hank Arnold 


 

My Blog:  <http://it.toolbox.com/blogs/personal-pc-assistant/>
http://it.toolbox.com/blogs/personal-pc-assistant/ 

Twitter: @Hank_PCDoc
Facebook:  <https://www.facebook.com/hank.arnold.96>
https://www.facebook.com/hank.arnold.96

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Melvin Backus
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 12:00 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] email access only - urgent

 

In which case I would ask if they need to be able to send email as a part of
the requirement so that you can implement an appropriate solution and move
forward accordingly.  If they only need to receive email, the forward does
that while "restricting them to only email access" as requested. :)

 

You can also always go the route of restricting logins to a specific machine
using the "Log On To" setting in AD and just pick a bogus machine name so
that it doesn't exist.  I don't believe that would stop them from accessing
share data if they tried to map shares however.

 

 

--
There are 10 kinds of people in the world...
         those who understand binary and those who don't.

 

From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of J- P
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 11:57 AM
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] email access only - urgent

 

I don't make the decisions,  they send a request I comply.

  
 

  _____  

From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] email access only - urgent
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 15:47:54 +0000

That said, I have to question why they would want to continue providing
access to email.  If there is some reason this person might legitimately
need to continue receiving these emails, I'd create a new contact and just
forward email to whatever external address they choose rather than actively
allowing them to continue full send/receive functionality.  

 

JMHO

 

--
There are 10 kinds of people in the world...
         those who understand binary and those who don't.

 

From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jake Gardner
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 11:43 AM
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] email access only - urgent

 

Our remote sessions are VPN controlled.  Webmail access however is not.   I
would just remove the user from VPN permissions. 

 

 

Thanks,

 

Jake Gardner

IT Administrator

267-352-2020 Ext. 246

www.ttcdas.com <http://www.ttcdas.com/> 

 

From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of J- P
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 11:35 AM
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: [NTSysADM] email access only - urgent

 

Hi all
 
Got a strange request , a user will be leaving the company and they want him
to ONLY have access to his exchange account, so no RDP, TS, desktop logons
etc..
 
 
If this is possible, what is the EASIEST way to go about it?

 

***Teletronics Technology Corporation***
This e-mail is confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the
addressee or authorized by the addressee to receive this e-mail, you may not
disclose, copy, distribute, or use this e-mail. If you have received this
e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail or by
telephone at 267-352-2020 and destroy this message and any copies.

Thank you.

*******************************************************************

  --  


Reply via email to