The real kicker on this one was that they only had a hard copy of the
email, and even that was not admitted into evidence because the PA did
not provide my attorney with a copy.  So they used an email that not
even the hard copy was allowed into evidence, let alone the header
information.  This was from a hotmail account so; yes anyone could have
opened the account and sent the email.  I am still trying to figure out
how to set MY computer's time so that it will show an email sent from a
hotmail account at whatever date and time that I set my computer at.  I
was under the impression that the date and time stamp was from the
SERVER.  This just drives the point home that judges do what they want
and have no respect for justice. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Anthony McInerney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 4:46 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Legal Email Issues - Dont shoot me :) -

I thought it was innocent until proven guilty????
Don't they *have* to prove (even you were at your PC) that it was you
who
logged into the account and sent the message?
Sounds like crap to me.
but thats just me, judges OBVIOUSLY know more about IT than we do.




http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

Reply via email to