Check out Mercury/Pegasus Mail systems for a full-featured mail server (not a discussion or App server, a la Exchange and Domino, however). If you're looking for a smaller server that can be administered by the brain-dead, get ArGo Mail Server (I even use that when I just need an SMTP server). For simplified Web access, but alas no POP or IMAP support, Deerfield's EMail Guardian (now in beta) looks promising. Their MDaemon mail server has POP (and IMAP, IIRC) capabilities and is a little more full-featured (neither are free, but they're alot cheaper than Exchange-both in initial costs and support). It may also have a web client, but I can't recall right now.
Exchange (especially 2000) is too resource and support-intensive to be used as a SMB mail server. The only thing Exchange offers which is hard to replicate with other, smaller programs, is the Calendaring. If someone has suggestions to replace
Oh, and I think Exchange has caught up a bit more to Domino lately, and GroupWise holds a steady 3rd place.

 -----Original Message-----
From: Kelly Borndale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2001 11:08 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 2000

To go a bit beyond "vanilla", many of them can also be set up as IMAP servers and have list serv type software as well.  All for free.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
K.Borndale
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -home email
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2001 10:47 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000

>>Even I-mail, a plain vanilla (boring) email server isn't far
behind in price!

If a client just wants a basic POP/SMTP server, the price for the product
would be almost nothing.  Postfix and Sendmail on some free *nix works just
fine.

Beer for Clayton and Joe.

William



-----Original Message-----
From: Joe L. Casale
To: NT System Admin Issues
Sent: 9/9/01 12:55 AM
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000

I think 1300.00 bucks Canadian last I checked for E2k?
Expensive?
Considering what you can do w/ it, I think not!
Geesh! Even I-mail, a plain vanilla (boring) email server isn't far
behind in price! As far as the sec holes in OL, well I am not worried,
part of the cost of doing biz I think. The man hours associated w/
exchange are practically nill! Automated backups, I verify 'em for fun
once and a while, and maybe if I am bored, Ill pull it offline for a
defrag. Think I did that 5 times in my life! Maybe while your investing
in all the man hours keeping your working, I peruse my eyes through M$'s
site and look for new OL holes!

Jlc



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 3:40 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000


I've been on systems with Exchange, Groupwise and Notes.   Currently
working with Notes R5.    I dont really like any of them - they are all
too
cumbersome.   I havent worked with any of the new web clients yet - one
thing I really dislike is the monster client they all have.   I am happy
that I dont have to try to keep up with all the Outlook security
problems
though.   We have had zero security problems with Notes R5.    I would
rather have a simple email system such as Novell IMS which requires no
administration if you are using NDS.   Then use a webserver for intranet
and database front end to take the place of the Notes databases.   We
use
all the features of Notes but it takes a huge amount of support
manhours.

Last I read, Notes has about 60 million seats and Exchange has about 35
million.    Everyone else is an also-ran.   Whatever features one has
over
the other will probably be shortlived, as they tend to converge on the
feature set that the users want.     I'm glad I dont have to select one
over the other right now.  They are all bloated, too expensive, and a
black
hole for support hours.


 

                    "Michael L.

                    Callahan"            To:     "NT System Admin
Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
                    <michael@call        cc:

                    ista.com>            Subject:     RE: Exchange 2000

 

                    09/08/2001

                    02:26 PM

                    Please

                    respond to

                    "NT System

                    Admin Issues"


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

Reply via email to