The 1720's only support one WIC, so I think your only option is to get a
switch (catalyst 2912 comes to mind) where you can set VLANs up and hang
firewalls between the two companies. You get the connectivity with the
protection, but it will not be free.

Greg


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 5:37 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Router connection issue



Basically, we have two fully functional networks, both with Cisco 1720
routers.  We want to keep the networks separate and only want to be able to
use a single T-1 instead of separate T-1s.  Both routers and T-1 connections
are in the same wiring closet.  What I would like to do is use some sort of
switch for both routers to plug into and from the switch, plug into the
single T-1.  We originally had their network connected to our and had all
sorts of issues between our NT4 servers and their Win2K servers, which is
why they went with a separate router and T-1.

HTH,
Pat

Pat Marshall
Systems Administrator
Microsoft Certified Professional
Flying Rhinoceros
1440 NW Overton Street
Portland, OR  97209
(503) 552-8700
(503) 221-7282 (Fax)



 

                    Steven.Beckwith@lsa

                    -assoc.com                 To:     "NT System Admin
Issues"                                  
 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>                           
                    09/28/01 02:01 PM          cc:

                    Please respond to          Subject:     RE: Router
connection issue                          
                    "NT System Admin

                    Issues"

 

 





I don't know what a white Russian is but it sounds good for a Friday. Don't
start a whole discussion on it - enough noise already.


1) the T-1 is a digital line that connects to a CSU/DSU (serial connection)
on your router.  As Jason points out, CSU's can be internal or external and
I suspect you have an internal WIC card similar to his set up which is why
there may be confusion.


Although you may have an RJ-45 connector and a regular patch cord (you could
actually use a regular phone line), it is NOT an ethernet type connection,
so only one router can host this connection (You could opt for a THIRD
router in your solution).


2) you are also going to need to know about how many "real" (outside) IP
addresses you have and whether you intend to "share" them (NAT - Network
address translation) or whether you will "redirect" them (PAT - Port address
translation).


A few other questions come to mind. Is there any inbound traffic that needs
to be directed to a specific box (www, smtp) i.e. Do you or the other
company want to have exchange servers or web servers accessible from the
internet (in which case you will need dedicated static outside IP addresses
for each service) or do you both still get mail via pop3, (in which case
maybe you can get by with NAT).  How many nodes each office, what types of
routers are these?


I like the idea of sharing resources to keep costs down, but I need to say
AMEN to the Firewalling suggestion, esp. to protect your network from theirs
and vice versa (as well as obviously - the outside).


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 1:30 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Router connection issue





-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 1:47 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Router connection issue





Where is the csu/dsu in your layout?  You need one of them to talk from the

t1 to the router.  All of my routers were purchased with the WICT1-DSU built
in so I just terminate there.  If you have an external csu like from Adtran

you need the cable going from the csu to the router, depending on the
interface.


Here's what I would recommend to segment the networks from each other. Make
sure your router has 2 ethernet ports, set one port up on their network and

the other on your network.  Setup a loopback port and route anything going
from network A to network B to that loopback and vice versa, but anything
going to and from the Internet would be routed properly.


Also....it's really really really necessary to setup some sort of firewall.

Perhaps that's where you can do your routing from network to internet. Setup
a Linux box with 3 NICs, 1 for each network and 1 for the internet router.
Setup the firewalling and away you go.


If you need more help, feel free to contact me directly.
Jason Morris CCDA CCNP
Network Administrator
MJMC, Inc.
708-225-2350
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 3:30 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Router connection issue






Hi Everyone,


I've been a lurker for quite a while (learning bunches), but now I have a
problem that totally confounds me.


There are two companies in the building where I work.  Each company has a
separate network connected through a separate Cisco router to a T-1.  For
financial reasons, the two companies have agreed to share a single T-1. What
I would like to do is have a switch  that both routers plug into, and which
then uplinks to the single T-1.  We do not want to co-mingle the networks.
According to Cisco's documentation, it is a straight-through cable from the
router to the T-1.  If I connect the switch or a hub between

our router and its T-1, I get an alarm on the router and no connection
lights on the switch/hub.  I've also tried using a crossover cable with the

same effect and have tried using/not using the uplink port on the
switch/hub.  Have also tried restarting the router between connection
changes.  What am I missing?  I'm ready to give up and head to the nearest
bar for a pitcher of White Russians.


TIA,
Pat


Pat Marshall
Systems Administrator
Microsoft Certified Professional
Flying Rhinoceros
1440 NW Overton Street
Portland, OR  97209
(503) 552-8700
(503) 221-7282 (Fax)






Want to unsub? Do that here: http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first: http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
Confidential:  This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are the
property of Lanco International and/or its affiliates, are confidential, and
are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom this
e-mail is addressed. If you are not one of the named recipient(s) or
otherwise have reason to believe that you have received this message in
error, please notify the sender at the above e-mail address and delete this

message immediately from your computer.  Any other use, retention,
dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail is strictly
prohibited.


Want to unsub? Do that here: http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first: http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/


Want to unsub? Do that here: http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first: http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/








Want to unsub? Do that here: http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first: http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/

Reply via email to